Petitioners Detail ‘Major Questions’ Claims In EPA GHG Risk Finding Suit

A free-market group seeking to invalidate EPA’s landmark greenhouse gas endangerment finding is detailing its claims that courts should subject the agency’s scientific findings to greater scrutiny because it forms the basis of “massively consequential” climate mitigation policy. “The endangerment finding is the most consequential agency scientific determination in the history of the American administrative state,” argues an Oct. 14 opening brief from petitioners in Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council (CHECC) v. EPA, et al. , pending in the U.S...