IPI Attacks EPA’s Expected Justifications To Scuttle GHG Risk Finding

A progressive think tank is attacking EPA’s expected arguments in its forthcoming proposal to scrap the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding that vehicle GHGs do not sufficiently contribute to public endangerment and that the agency should have factored costs into the finding. In just-released analyses, the New York University’s Institute for Policy Integrity (IPI) asserts EPA’s expected claims clash with other prior risk findings and rules targeting much smaller sources of air pollution. IPI’s pushback comes amid expectations that the...